
BD/Marketing
Hybrid
Strategic Case Analysis For The BD/Marketing Hybrid Model For A/E/C Firms
ABSTRACT

The Marketing/BD Hybrid Model: Reducing BD Costs by 52% While Winning More Work
More than 40% of A/E/C firms are reconsidering their traditional business development structure—and for good reason. Industry research reveals a fundamental misalignment: clients want to engage with principals and project leaders, not non-technical BD staff. Meanwhile, firms struggle with BD positions costing $270,000+ annually while delivering limited client-facing effectiveness.
This presentation introduces the Marketing/BD Hybrid Model—a strategic alternative that reduces non-billable BD costs by 52% ($140,000 annually) while improving alignment with client preferences and increasing win rates.
Drawing from current 2025 salary data and industry research, this session will reveal:
The Cost Comparison: Full-time BD Director ($269,500 annually) vs. Marketing/BD Hybrid ($129,600)—with detailed breakdowns of salary, benefits, and operational expenses using verified 2025 industry data
-
Why Traditional BD Fails: Data from Fusion BD's 2025 End-User Survey showing client preferences for principal engagement in relationship building, RFP/RFQ processes, and project interviews
-
The Effectiveness Gap: Why BD staff are excluded from the activities that actually win work (and why this matters for your overhead investment)
-
What the Hybrid Model Does: Multi-functional marketing support that empowers principals rather than replacing them—including market research, pursuit coordination, proposal management, and strategic campaign execution
-
The Industry Shift: Why 40% of firms are adopting this approach and what early adopters are achieving
-
Implementation Strategy: How to transition from traditional BD structure to the hybrid model, including role definition, principal training, and process redesign
This presentation provides a data-driven business case for rethinking your BD structure. Attendees will receive specific cost comparisons, salary benchmarks, and a practical implementation framework they can take back to their firms.
Ideal for:
• Firm leaders evaluating BD staffing and overhead costs
• Principals frustrated with traditional BD effectiveness
• Marketing directors seeking to expand their strategic impact
• CFOs and managing partners focused on profitability and non-billable cost reduction
• Anyone currently hiring or restructuring their BD/marketing teams
Key Takeaways:
1. Complete cost comparison with current 2025 salary data ($140K savings potential)
2. Understanding the client engagement gap in traditional BD roles
3. Defining the Marketing/BD Hybrid role for maximum effectiveness
4. Strategies for empowering principals as primary business developers
5. Step-by-step implementation roadmap for the hybrid model
6. Expected outcomes: cost reduction, improved win rates, better client alignment
Conclusions:
The Marketing/BD Hybrid Model isn't about cutting corners—it's about strategic optimization. By reducing non-billable BD costs by 52% while simultaneously improving alignment with client preferences.
The question isn't whether to consider the Marketing/BD Hybrid Model. The question is whether you can afford not to—when your competitors are achieving better results at half the cost.
To recieve a PDF of the Full Strategic Case Analysis For BD/Marketing Hybrid Model For A/E/C Firms
Or
If you'd like to arrage a full presentation of the analysis for you and your leadership team,
email me directly: steven@fusionbdllc.com
